I just took a worship style assessment over here. I usually don't put a whole lot into these type of tests, but this one hit the nail right on the head.
I came out as someone who likes activist type worship. If you know me personally, you're probably laughing at how true that is. What's really cool is that contemplative and intellectual come in at a close second and third, which is right on the money as well!
The descriptions of each of the worship types are below. Go take the test for yourself and let me know what it says about you. By the way, I found the link to this test on Gary Means' Blessed Are the Poor in Spirit blog. Check him out.
Sacred PathwaysWorship Style Assessment
Chris -Based on your responses to the Sacred Pathways Assessment, your temperament favors an Activist approach to worship.
Intellectual 21
Contemplative 22
Enthusiast 18
Caregiver 17
Activist 24
Ascetic 17
Traditionalist 16
Sensate 14
Naturalist 14
The information contained in this online assessment has been borrowed from the following book:"Sacred Pathways" by Gary L. Thomas© Copyright Zondervan Publishing, 2002click here to purchase this and other books by Gary Thomas, from Amazon.com
Summary of spiritual temperaments:
Intellectual - Loving God with the Mind:These Christians live in the world of concepts. They may feel closest to God when they first understand something new about Him.
Contemplative - Loving God through Adoration:These Christians seek to love God with the purest, deepest, and brightest love imaginable. They want nothing more than some privacy and quiet to gaze upon the face of their heavenly Lover and give all of themselves to God.
Enthusiast - Loving God with Mystery & Celebration:Excitement and mystery in worship is the spiritual lifeblood of enthusiasts. They are inspired by joyful celebration; cheerleaders for God and the Christian life. They don't want to just know concepts, but to experience them, to feel them, and to be moved by them. They like to let go and experience God on the precipice of excitement and awe.
Caregiver - Loving God by Loving Others:Caregivers serve God by serving others. They often claim to see Christ in the poor and needy, and their faith is built up by interacting with other people. Caring for others recharges a caregiver's batteries.
Activist - Loving God Through Confrontation:These Christians define worship as standing against evil and calling sinners to repentance. They are energized more by interaction with others, even in conflict, than by being alone or in small groups. Activists are spiritually nourished through the battle.
Ascetic - Loving God in Solitude and Simplicity:Ascetics want nothing more than to be left alone in prayer. Let there be nothing to distract them--no pictures, no loud music--and leave them alone to pray in silence and simplicity.
Traditionalist - Loving God Through Ritual and Symbol:Traditionalists are fed by what are often termed the historic dimensions of faith: rituals, symbols, sacraments, and sacrifice. They tend to have a disciplined life of faith and have a need for ritual and structure.
Sensate - Loving God with the Senses:Sensate Christians want to be lost in the awe, beauty, and splendor of God. They are drawn particularly to the liturgical, the majestic, the grand. They want to be filled with sights, sounds, and smells that overwhelm them. The five senses are God's most effective inroad to their hearts.
Naturalist - Loving God Out of Doors:The naturalist seeks to leave the formal architecture and the padded pews to enter an entirely new "cathedral", a place that God himself has built: the out-of-doors.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
Took me awhile, but I wanted to see if there was anything surprising (I don't think there was...):
Caregiver 27
Enthusiast 24
Contemplative 23
Naturalist 18
Ascetic 17
Activist 16
Intellectual 16
Traditionalist 15
Sensate 12
What's up with all the book references? I guessed based on the titles but I'd never heard of most of them... along with some of the words they mentioned ("high church", "church dogmatics", etc.)..
Chris,
This comes out like I though it would for you.
Yeah, I didn't get some of the references either.
Post a Comment